Olympus Has Fallen Vs. London Has Fallen: Comparing The Films

Natalie Brooks

4 min read

Post on May 13, 2025

4.8

Share

Plot and Narrative Structure

Both Olympus Has Fallen and London Has Fallen share a similar core premise: a coordinated terrorist attack targeting the highest levels of power. However, the specifics differ significantly. Olympus Has Fallen focuses on a siege of the White House, a contained but intense struggle for survival against North Korean operatives. London Has Fallen, on the other hand, expands the scope, depicting a large-scale, coordinated attack on London during a state funeral, resulting in a city-wide crisis.

• Olympus Has Fallen Plot Points: A North Korean terrorist group attacks the White House, taking the President hostage. Mike Banning, the only surviving Secret Service agent, must fight his way through the terrorists to rescue the President.
• London Has Fallen Plot Points: A global conspiracy targets world leaders attending a state funeral in London. Mike Banning, now the President's chief bodyguard, finds himself in the middle of a city-wide massacre and must prevent further attacks.

While Olympus Has Fallen offers a more contained, suspenseful narrative focusing on the White House siege, London Has Fallen boasts a larger scale, showcasing a more widespread and chaotic attack. The pacing differs too; Olympus Has Fallen features a tighter, more claustrophobic feel, whereas London Has Fallen delivers a broader, more expansive action experience. Both films utilize minimal flashbacks, keeping the narrative streamlined.

Action Sequences and Visual Effects

Both films deliver non-stop action, but their styles differ. Olympus Has Fallen leans towards close-quarters combat and intense gun battles within the confines of the White House. London Has Fallen, however, showcases larger-scale action sequences, featuring explosions, vehicle chases, and widespread destruction across London's iconic landmarks.

• Memorable Action Sequences: The White House siege in Olympus Has Fallen and the city-wide destruction in London Has Fallen are both memorable, offering distinct visual spectacles.
• Visual Effects: While both films utilize CGI, London Has Fallen boasts more extensive visual effects, showcasing larger-scale destruction and more elaborate action sequences.
• Realism vs. Spectacle: Olympus Has Fallen attempts a degree of realism within its action, while London Has Fallen embraces a more over-the-top, spectacular approach.

The choreography in both is effective, though London Has Fallen's scale gives it a slight edge in visual spectacle.

Characters and Performances

Gerard Butler's portrayal of Mike Banning is central to both films. He's a hardened, skilled agent driven by duty and loyalty. While his character arc isn't drastically different between the two films, London Has Fallen shows a slightly more battle-weary and world-weary Banning, facing greater emotional turmoil.

• Mike Banning's Evolution: In Olympus Has Fallen, he's focused on rescuing the President; in London Has Fallen, he grapples with the larger consequences of global terrorism.
• Supporting Characters: Aaron Eckhart as President Benjamin Asher in Olympus Has Fallen and Morgan Freeman as Allan Trumbull provide strong supporting performances, adding depth to the political thriller aspects of the films.
• Acting Performances: Butler’s performance in both is consistently strong, portraying a believable and relatable action hero.

The supporting cast contributes effectively, providing a believable political backdrop to the action.

Themes and Social Commentary

Both films explore themes of political corruption, terrorism, and national security. Olympus Has Fallen focuses more on the vulnerability of the American political system, while London Has Fallen takes a broader view, depicting the threat of global terrorism and international cooperation (or lack thereof).

• Themes in Olympus Has Fallen: Political vulnerability, personal sacrifice, and the importance of national security.
• Themes in London Has Fallen: Global terrorism, international relations, and the aftermath of widespread violence.

Both films offer a clear, if somewhat simplistic, commentary on these themes. While neither film delves into complex political analysis, they effectively use the action thriller format to highlight anxieties around security and political instability.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Favorite Fallen Film

Both Olympus Has Fallen and London Has Fallen offer thrilling action sequences and suspenseful narratives within the action thriller and political thriller genres. While Olympus Has Fallen provides a more contained, suspenseful experience focused on the White House siege, London Has Fallen expands the scale, offering a city-wide battle against global terrorism. Ultimately, your preference will likely depend on your preference for scale and intensity.

Which Fallen film is your favorite? Let the debate begin: Olympus Has Fallen or London Has Fallen? Share your thoughts in the comments below!